Coronavirus transmission in Hidalgo in decline until September 11, but not deaths




José Aurelio Granados Alcantar
Ph.D. in Regional Development and Territorial Planning



All available indicators to evaluate the epidemiological situation of COVID-19 indicate that the worst of the third transmission in Hidalgo is over. This past week (September 5-11), 1,579 cases were recorded, 19% less than last week (August 29-September 4), when 1,950 cases were recorded, but 42% less than the week of August 15-21, when the highest number of infections of this wave was recorded with 2,706 (see graph 1).

For this reason, the Effective Reproduction Rate (the average number of people to whom each infected individual can transmit the virus) was at a low level of transmission with 0.8, that is, one infected person does not infect another (See image 1).

Similarly, hospitalizations continued to decline, with general hospital beds at 53.4% on September 11, compared to 76.4% occupancy on August 21; ventilator beds were 43.7% on September 11, compared to 66.9% on August 21; and the occupancy of ventilator beds in Intensive Care Units (ICU) was 27.3% on September 11, compared to 84.6% on August 21.

While cases of coronavirus transmission continue to decline, deaths are not. Even the week of August 29-September 4 was the week with the highest number of deaths in this third wave, with 161 deaths reported. Although in this last week they dropped to 137 deaths (see Graph 2), these are still very hard figures. However, given the decline in the transmission of infections and the levels of ICU ventilator beds, it is now expected that in the following weeks there will be a considerable drop in the number of deaths.

On the other hand, municipal epidemiological curves show that transmission in the five most populated municipalities in the state: Pachuca, Mineral de la Reforma, Tizayuca, Tulancingo and Huejutla are in decline. Only in the municipalities of Apan, Tepeapulco and Atotonilco de Tula has transmission not yet been controlled (see Figures 1 to 6).

In the municipalities with the largest populations, there has been a decrease in cases. Tulancingo registered the greatest decrease, going from 338 infections on August 21 to 140 on September 11, a reduction of almost 60% of infections in these three weeks; similarly, Pachuca, Tizayuca, Tula, Huejutla, Tepeji del Río, Mineral de la Reforma, Ixmiquilpan and Atotonilco de Tula have reduced their infections (see Table 1).

The highest incidence rate of coronavirus infections as of September 21 is in the municipalities of Molango, Nopala, Apan, Xochicoatlán, Tepeapulco, Ajacuba, Tlaxcoapan, Juárez Hidalgo and Tasquillo with rates above 100 infected per 100,000 inhabitants, which indicates that the epidemic is out of control in these municipalities according to the parameters of the World Health Organization (WHO).

Only Eloxochitlán, Jaltocán and Nicolás Flores have no registered cases of coronavirus in the state as of September 21; while Cardonal, Tenango and Xochiatipan have only one case (See Table 2).

With these indicators, it is expected that next week, new municipalities will announce that they will begin the process of opening primary and secondary schools, thus gradually incorporating children and adolescents to face-to-face educational activities, which have been cancelled since April of last year.





Source: Own elaboration based on SSA Daily Technical Communiqués. https://www.gob.mx/salud/documentos/


Source: Own elaboration based on SSA Daily Technical Communiqués. https://www.gob.mx/salud/documentos/


Source: Covid-19 research and data modeling products. National Council for Science and Technology. Date of Consultation September 11. https://salud.conacyt.mx/coronavirus/


Coronavirus epidemic curves in the main municipalities of Hidalgo.

Figure 1. Pachuca, Mineral de la Reforma and Zempoala

Figure 2. Tulancingo and Tizayuca

Figure 3. Huejutla

 

Figure 4. Apan

Figure 5. Atotonilco de Tula

Figure 6. Tepeapulco


Source: Covid-19 research and data modeling products. National Council for Science and Technology. Date of Consultation September 11. https://salud.conacyt.mx/coronavirus/investigacion/




Municipality Population Cases as of August 21 Cases as of September 11 Difference between September 11,
and August 21, 2009.
Tulancingo 168,369 338 140 -198
Pachuca de Soto 314,331 389 269 -120
Tizayuca 168,302 202 113 -89
Tula de Allende 115,107 136 48 -88
Huejutla de Reyes 126,781 92 27 -65
Tepeji del Rio 90,546 124 67 -57
Mineral de la Reforma 202,749 190 138 -52
Ixmiquilpan 98,654 70 26 -44
Atotonilco de Tula 62,470 67 25 -42
Zempoala 57,906 64 24 -40
Tepeapulco 56,245 108 70 -38
Cuautepec de Hinojosa 60,421 60 23 -37
Atotonilco el Grande 30,135 36 7 -29
Santiago 39,561 64 35 -29
Zacualtipán 38,155 46 18 -28
Zimapán 39,927 38 10 -28
Actopan 61,002 56 31 -25
Atitalaquia 31,525 37 12 -25
Ajacuba 18,872 42 21 -21
Tasquillo 17,441 38 18 -20
San Salvador 36,796 23 6 -17
Tenango de Doria 17,503 18 1 -17
Tetepango 11,768 23 6 -17
El Arenal 19,836 22 7 -15
Mineral del Monte 14,324 19 5 -14
Tlaxcoapan 28,626 43 30 -13
Tepehuacán 31,235 16 4 -12
San Bartolo Tutotepec 17,699 15 4 -11
Alfajayucan 19,162 15 5 -10
Francisco I. Madero 36,248 14 4 -10
Huehuetla 22,846 15 5 -10
Lolotla 9,474 14 4 -10
Tezontepec de A. 55,134 33 23 -10
Metztitlan 20,962 11 3 -8
Mixquiahuala 47,222 29 21 -8
Tianguistengo 14,340 14 6 -8
San Felipe Orizatlan 38,492 13 5 -8
Cardonal 19,431 8 1 -7
Omitlán de Juárez 9,295 12 5 -7
Chapulhuacán 22,903 8 2 -6
Pisaflores 18,723 10 4 -6
Tepetitlan 10,830 14 8 -6
Villa de Tezontepec 13,032 8 2 -6
Huasca de Ocampo 17,607 10 5 -5
Tlahuiltepa 9,086 8 3 -5
Chapantongo 12,967 10 7 -3
Chilcuautla 18,909 13 10 -3
Metepec 13,078 10 7 -3
Nicolas Flores 6,265 3 0 -3
Tecozautla 38,010 15 12 -3
Zapotlán de Juárez 21,443 9 6 -3
Acaxochitlán 46,065 15 13 -2
Jacala 12,290 4 2 -2
Jaltocán 10,523 2 0 -2
Singuilucan 15,142 5 3 -2
Acatlan 22,268 6 4 -2
Santiago de Anaya 18,329 10 9 -1
Eloxochitlán 2,593 1 0 -1
Calnali 16,150 7 7 0
Emiliano Zapata 15,175 13 13 0
Juarez Hidalgo 2,895 3 3 0
Tlahuelilpan 19,067 14 14 0
Yahualica 24,674 4 4 0
Atlapexco 19,812 6 7 1
Huautla 20,673 5 6 1
Huazalingo 12,766 5 6 1
Huichapan 47,425 46 47 1
Mineral del Chico 8,878 4 5 1
Progress 23,641 19 20 1
Tlanalapa 11,113 6 7 1
Xochiatipan 18,260 0 1 1
The Mission 9,819 1 3 2
Pacula 4,748 1 3 2
St. Augustine Metz. 9,449 2 4 2
Tolcayuca 21,362 6 8 2
White Water 10,313 3 6 3
Almoloya 12,546 6 9 3
Epazoyucan 16,285 10 14 4
San Agustin Tlaxiaca 38,891 10 15 5
Xochicoatlán 7,015 4 9 5
Molango 11,578 19 25 6
Apan 46,681 52 62 10
Tlanchinol 37,722 4 15 11
Nopala 16,948 10 26 16

Source: Own elaboration based on the information "Monitoreo de la Situación del Covid-19 en los municipios de México " https://covid19.ciga.unam.mx/apps/covid-19-monitoreo-de-la-situaci%C3%B3n-por-municipios/explore



Municipality Population Cases as of September 21 Incidence Rate (Cases / Population per hundred thousand)
Molango 11,578 25 215.9
Nopala 16,948 26 153.4
Apan 46,681 62 132.8
Xochicoatlán 7,015 9 128.3
Tepeapulco 56,245 70 124.5
Ajacuba 18,872 21 111.3
Tlaxcoapan 28,626 30 104.8
Juarez Hidalgo 2,895 3 103.6
Tasquillo 17,441 18 103.2
Huichapan 47,425 47 99.1
Santiago 39,561 35 88.5
Epazoyucan 16,285 14 86
Emiliano Zapata 15,175 13 85.7
Pachuca de Soto 314,331 269 85.6
Progress 23,641 20 84.6
Tulancingo 168,369 140 83.2
Tepeji del Rio 90,546 67 74
Tepetitlan 10,830 8 73.9
Tlahuelilpan 19,067 14 73.4
Almoloya 12,546 9 71.7
Mineral de la Reforma 202,749 138 68.1
Tizayuca 168,302 113 67.1
Pacula 4,748 3 63.2
Tlanalapa 11,113 7 63
White Water 10,313 6 58.2
Mineral del Chico 8,878 5 56.3
Chapantongo 12,967 7 54
Omitlán de Juárez 9,295 5 53.8
Metepec 13,078 7 53.5
Chilcuautla 18,909 10 52.9
Tetepango 11,768 6 51
Actopan 61,002 31 50.8
Santiago de Anaya 18,329 9 49.1
Zacualtipán 38,155 18 47.2
Huazalingo 12,766 6 47
Mixquiahuala 47,222 21 44.5
Calnali 16,150 7 43.3
St. Augustine Metz. 9,449 4 42.3
Lolotla 9,474 4 42.2
Tianguistengo 14,340 6 41.8
Tezontepec de A. 55,134 23 41.7
Tula de Allende 115,107 48 41.7
Zempoala 57,906 24 41.4
Atotonilco de Tula 62,470 25 40
Tlanchinol 37,722 15 39.8
San Agustin Tlaxiaca 38,891 15 38.6
Cuautepec de Hinojosa 60,421 23 38.1
Atitalaquia 31,525 12 38.1
Tolcayuca 21,362 8 37.4
Atlapexco 19,812 7 35.3
El Arenal 19,836 7 35.3
Mineral del Monte 14,324 5 34.9
Tlahuiltepa 9,086 3 33
Tecozautla 38,010 12 31.6
The Mission 9,819 3 30.6
Huautla 20,673 6 29
Huasca de Ocampo 17,607 5 28.4
Acaxochitlán 46,065 13 28.2
Zapotlán de Juárez 21,443 6 28
Ixmiquilpan 98,654 26 26.4
Alfajayucan 19,162 5 26.1
Zimapán 39,927 10 25
Atotonilco el Grande 30,135 7 23.2
San Bartolo Tutotepec 17,699 4 22.6
Huehuetla 22,846 5 21.9
Pisaflores 18,723 4 21.4
Huejutla de Reyes 126,781 27 21.3
Singuilucan 15,142 3 19.8
Acatlan 22,268 4 18
San Salvador 36,796 6 16.3
Jacala 12,290 2 16.3
Yahualica 24,674 4 16.2
Villa de Tezontepec 13,032 2 15.3
Metztitlan 20,962 3 14.3
San Felipe Orizatlan 38,492 5 13
Tepehuacán 31,235 4 12.8
Francisco I. Madero 36,248 4 11
Chapulhuacán 22,903 2 8.7
Tenango de Doria 17,503 1 5.7
Xochiatipan 18,260 1 5.5
Cardonal 19,431 1 5.1
Nicolas Flores 6,265 0 0
Jaltocán 10,523 0 0
Eloxochitlán 2,593 0 0

Source: Own elaboration based on the information "Monitoreo de la Situación del Covid-19 en los municipios de México " https://covid19.ciga.unam.mx/apps/covid-19-monitoreo-de-la-situaci%C3%B3n-por-municipios/explore



WHO IS...?

José Aurelio Granados Alcantar holds a PhD in Regional Development and Territorial Planning from the University of Barcelona, Spain. He is a research professor in the academic area of Sociology and Demography, Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities (ICSHu) at the Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo (UAEH). He is a member of the National System of Researchers, level I.